Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Berg v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01169
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Roman Martinez, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Justin Sedon v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Sedon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lickteig v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01139
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman, Roman Martinez, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lickteig
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
US v. Victor Roman
as 17-6898
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VICTOR ROMAN, a/k/a Chaparro
Joseph Pirela v. The State of Florida
as 17-1781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Discrimination in Cases with No evidence and State of Florida False Sentences, DENIS FONSECA, Miami Police officer, ANGEL JOSE MIRANDA, Miami Police officer and others
Pirela v. The State of Florida et al
as 5:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
The State of Florida, Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lorena Roman-Aguilar v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-1445
Petitioner:
LORENA ALEJANDRA ROMAN-AGUILAR
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Pearson v. Bank of America et al
as 7:2016cv01921
Plaintiff:
Warren Lemont Pearson
Defendant:
Bank of America, Mary Taylor, Jennifer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
US v. Carlos Avila
as 16-4188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS ADRIAN OLEA AVILA, a/k/a Eric Santiago Roman, a/k/a Carlos Olea Avila
Doe No. 93 v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn
as 1:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
John Doe No. 93
Defendant:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
