Cases 31 - 40 of 2,281
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-302
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Petitioner:
ACCENTURE LLP
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-299
Petitioner:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
US v. Charles Cain
as 23-7206
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES DAVID CAIN
US v. David Tatum
as 23-4710
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID TATUM
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY LOHMAN and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, A Professional Corporation
Defendant:
JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY LOHMAN, JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS and others
Defendant:
DAVID MIZE, IBRAHIM MUHTASEB, ALYSON DYKES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
