Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Claudia Sibrian-De Alfaro v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-1365
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA PATRICIA SIBRIAN-DE ALFARO
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Claudia Guevara-Carranza v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-1487
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA JASMIN GUEVARA-CARRANZA and CLAUDIA MARIA MEDINA-GUEVARA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Claudia Guardado-Garcia v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-1053
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA YESENIA GUARDADO-GARCIA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Claudia Gamez de Argeta v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1325
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA GAMEZ DE ARGETA, a/k/a Claudia Marisol Gamez de Argueta
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Hackman et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Emory E. Hackman, Jr. , Mary Cook Hackman Arlington Trust and Gainesville Commerce Center, LLC.
Defendant:
Edmund E. Wilson, Fountain Group of Companies, Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Claudia Barrios De Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-1526
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA YESENIA BARRIOS DE MARTINEZ and DAVID MARTINEZ-BARRIOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Hernandez, et al v. Promex, LLC et al
as 3:2010mc00129
Petitioner:
Claudia Hernandez and Productos Zapatol Corp.
Respondent:
Promex, LLC and Yolanda Eustaquio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
El Harizi v. Pardinas-Ocana
as 8:2007cv00712
Plaintiff:
Khalid El Harizi, Khalid El Harizi and Khalid El Harizi
Defendant:
Claudia Pardinas-Ocana and Claudia Pardinas-Ocana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez v. Mukasey
as 06-2190
Petitioner:
LUIS JAVIER LOPEZ, CLAUDIA PATRICIA ORTEGA-AGUIRRE, DAVID LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
