Cases 81 - 90 of 3,282
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
RIOS v. BLINKEN
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
ELVIN TORRES RIOS
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
US v. Orlando Foote, Jr.
as 23-6682
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ORLANDO ANTOINE FOOTE, JR., a/k/a J-Man, a/k/a OJ
Ebrahimi et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
Soraya Ebrahimi and Yousef Ebrahimi
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, Rena Bitter, Stephanie Zakhem and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Maroz et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Uladzimir Maroz and Tatyana Maroz
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Antony J. Blinken, Embassy of the United States, Warsaw, Poland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Naseri et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Rezvan Naseri and Mohammad Gholizadeh
Defendant:
Antony J. Blinken and RENA BITTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Woolls v. Wills et al
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Woolls
Defendant:
Claive J. Wills and Wendy Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
