Cases 1 - 10 of 3,475
Jallal v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Jallad
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, sec.gov/Chair Gary Gensler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Fausto Cruz Claros v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1446
Petitioner:
FAUSTO EULISES CRUZ CLAROS, SANDRA GUADALUPE AMAYA DE CRUZ, E.M.C.A. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Osman Amador Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1448
Petitioner:
OSMAN ELIAQUIN AMADOR HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Ward v. West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lee Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) and Attorney Joseph Brophy Cordell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Cesar Flores Nolasco v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner:
CESAR FLORES NOLASCO, a/k/a Cesar Youany Flores, a/k/a Cesar Flores, a/k/a Cesar Yovany Flores Nolasco
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Samuel Bahreini v. Paul Zsebedics
as 24-1411
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BAHREINI
Defendant:
PAUL ZSEBEDICS, AL SIVICK, MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Rahmani v. IRS et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Najia Rahmani
Defendant:
IRS, Paul Ferguson, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Saul Posada-Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
SAUL ANTONIO POSADA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Zahed et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Amir Zahed and Regwida Neayish
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Acting Associate Dir Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ricardo Gomez-Correa v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1368
Petitioner:
RICARDO GOMEZ-CORREA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
