Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Joseph Mays v. T. Smith
as 20-7540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HALFAST, Case Manager, OFFICER SLAYDON, OFFICER GLASS and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-7235
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 20-6628
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 19-7850
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Thomas B Smith, ADDX Corporation, Future Technologies Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith et al v. Shang et al
as 1:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
David B. Smith and Shaoming Cheng
Defendant:
Ronglan Shang, Chunyan Zhao, Jun-Ling Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Ashcraft, et al v. Conoco, Inc., et al
as 7:1995cv00187
Plaintiff:
Hurshel L. Ashcraft , All Plaintiffs , Frances L. Ashcraft and others
Defendant:
Conoco, Inc. , Kayo Oil Company and Triangle Facilities, Inc.
Movant:
United States of America , J. Harold Seagle, George Rountree, III and others
Respondent:
Kirsten B. Mitchell , Cory Reiss and Wilmington Morning Star
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Albemarle Properties, Inc. v. Smith
as 3:2008mc00028
Debtor:
Amy B Smith
Plaintiff:
Albemarle Properties, Inc. and Albemarle Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Amy B Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
