Cases 1 - 10 of 16
KM FARMS, INC. et al v. CORTEVA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
KM FARMS, INC., BLAKE TURNER, JOHN W. JENKINS and others
Defendant:
CORTEVA, INC., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM AGREEMENTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2023cv00117
In Re:
CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM AGREEMENTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION and CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN W. JENKINS
Consolidated Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAY FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. & SON FARM PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
CORTEVA, INC., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION and others
Consolidated Defendant:
HELENA AGRI-ENTERPRISES LLC, BASF SE, BASF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2023md03062
In Re:
CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANDERSON, FREDERICK C. CROSCUT, R & D ADAMS DAIRY FARM, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAY FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. & SON FARM PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
HELENA AGRI-ENTERPRISES LLC, BASF SE, BASF CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Deidra Squire v. Identity, Inc.
as 21-2410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEIDRA R. SQUIRE
Defendant / Appellee:
IDENTITY, INC.
Defendant:
DIEGO URIBURU, Executive Director, CANDANCE KATTER, Former Senior Program Director, CAROLYN CAMACHO, Director of Youth Centers and others
Mey v. Matrix Warranty Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants 1-5, SING for Service, LLC, Matrix Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee:
GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant:
BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
