Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Murphy v. State of Delaware Family Court et al
as 1:2024cv01702
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
State of Delaware Family Court, Andreza Peticacis, Michelle Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Benjamin Locke v. North Carolina State University
as 24-148
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN C. LOCKE
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY and ROBERT M. MURPHY, JR., in his official and individual capacities
Lanskey v. Medical Properties Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lanskey
Defendant:
Medical Properties Trust, Inc., Edward K. Aldag, Jr., J. Kevin Hanna and others
US v. James Murphy
as 24-6109
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES L. MURPHY
Consolidation Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 23-1989
Petitioner:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JOSEPH MURPHY, JR.
Murphy v. Does 1-20
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
James A. Murphy
Defendant:
John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
City of Charleston v. Brabham Oil Company, Inc.
as 23-1802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON
Defendant / Appellant:
BRABHAM OIL COMPANY, INC., COLONIAL GROUP, INC., ENMARK STATIONS, INC. and others
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
