Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dibble v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02905
Plaintiff:
Robert William Dibble
Defendant:
William F. Planer, Ruth B. Cassidy, Malik H. Aluqdah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CASE OPENED IN ERROR - Girard et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Girard, Beulah Slesser and Suzanne McLeod, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hansell B. Malone, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Jontez McLeod
as 22-4189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONTEZ XAVIER MCLEOD
Joshua Bower v. Jude Onuoha, M.D., C.D.
as 21-6566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA BOWER
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDE O. ONUOHA, FCI Bennettsville, SC, both individually and as employees of their respective employers and FOY D. CONNELL, MD McLeod Health Cheraw, both individually and as empoyees of their respective employers
Stephen Sanders v. McLeod Health
as 20-1812
Defendant / Appellee:
MCLEOD HEALTH, CLARENDON
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF CLARENDON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN E. SANDERS
Priscilla Everette-Oates v. Lolita Chapman
as 20-1093
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLEOD, Director, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity, NORTH CAROLINA STATE AUDITOR, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SBI AGENT LOLITA CHAPMAN, in her individual capacity, SHARON EDMUNDSON, in her individual capacity, BETH WOOD, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRISCILLA EVERETTE-OATES
Plaintiff:
DUARTHUR OATES
Jordan v. Wilson et al
as 3:2019cv01518
Defendant:
John Mobley, John Tate, Lir Derieg and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Phillip McLeod
as 16-4210
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP BOYD MCLEOD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
