Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Sodexo, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Sodexo, Inc. and Sodexo Operations, LLC
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, National Beef Packing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Compass Group USA, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00725
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Eastern Associated Coal, LLC v. DOWCP
as 23-1491
Petitioner:
EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL, LLC and PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and LEE E. PACK
Darrell Goss v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-7319
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN LEE PACK, BRYAN P. STIRLING, MAJOR RICHARD CHVALA and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Marquel Ali v. Raleigh County
as 19-1651
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SNUFFER, individually and in his official capacity as officer with the Beckley Police Department, CITY OF BECKLEY, GARY EPLING, individually and in his official capacity as detective with the Raleigh County Sheriff's Department and others
Defendant:
BECKLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE and RALEIGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUEL ALI
Dialysis of Des Moines, LLC. et al v. Smithfield Foods Health Care Plan et al
as 2:2018cv00653
Defendant:
Smithfield Foods Health Care Plan, Smithfield Foods, Inc. and The Smithfield Packing Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DaVita Inc. and Dialysis of Des Moines, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Weightpack, Inc. v. Marannano et al
as 3:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Weightpack, Inc.
Defendant:
Guiseppe Marannano, Susan Marannano, Zima-Pack, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
