Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Schmitt et al v. Hake
as 1:2023cv02075
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Schmitt and Bruce A. Hake, P.C.
Defendant:
Bruce A. Hake
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Jerome McBride v. J. Most
as 21-6302
Defendant / Appellee:
W. MULLER, SGT. JANET M. PUFFENBERGER, DAYENA CORCORAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME MCBRIDE
David Brightwell v. J. Morgan
as 20-7461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
AUDREY BROWN, Administrative Officer II, Inmate Grievance Office, SGT. ABIODUN ADAMOLEKUN, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION O. WAYNE HILL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Donato v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01271
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Donato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Cramer v. Oribital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01225
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cramer
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman, David W. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Simnowitz v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01181
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Simnowitz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Justin Sedon v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Sedon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Berg v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01169
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Roman Martinez, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ayzin v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01151
Defendant:
Romas Martinez, IV, Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ayzin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
