Cases 1 - 10 of 30
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC v. Andrew Ritter
as 23-1472
Plaintiff / Appellant:
360 VIRTUAL DRONE SERVICES LLC and MICHAEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW L. RITTER, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JOHN M. LOGSDON, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JONATHAN S. CARE, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors and others
Daniel Parsons v. Warden Hawkins
as 21-7611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL B. PARSONS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN HAWKINS, CAROLINE FLEMING, CRISTEL VAUGHAN and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR ROY COOPER, DIRECTOR TODD E. ISHEE and KIMBERLY D. GRANDE, Grievance Examiner
Kenneth Woodfin v. Adrianne Bennett
as 21-7581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE WOODFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADRIANNE L. BENNETT, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board, BRIAN MORAN, Secretary of Public Safety, RALPH NORTHAM, Governor of Virginia and others
Lynch v. Tong et al
as 3:2021cv00562
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, II
Defendant:
William Tong, Sandra Persten Gersten, CT Medical Examining Board and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 151
Jordan Jones v. George Solomon
as 21-7239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN ANDREW JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, W. DAVID GUICE, Commissioner of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, FRANK L. PERRY, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
FNU WILLIAMS, Inmate Grievance Examiner for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, ELIZABETH D. WALLACE, Inmate Grievance Examiner for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, JASMINE BELYEU, Inmate Grievance Examiner for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilson
as 21-1369
Defendant:
EDWARD SIMMER, in his official capacity as Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 9th Judicial Circuit, CHRISTOPHER C. WRIGHT, in his official capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREENVILLE WOMEN'S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff and TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Intervenor:
HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina and JAMES H. LUCAS, a/k/a Jay, in his official capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, III, in his official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 13th Judicial Circuit and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Tracey Grady v. B. S.
as 21-6425
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN HELIMS, Officer at Monroe Police Department, in his individual capacity, B. S., in her individual capacity, MICHELE SHOULTES, Officer at Monroe Police Department, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Solon Phillips v. Maryland Bd of Law Examiners
as 21-1218
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN A. AZRAEL, MATTHEW MILLS, JOHN F. MUDD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLON PHILLIPS
Antonette Jefferson v. MD State Board of Law Examiner
as 20-2223
Appellant:
ANTONETTE JEFFERSON
Appellee:
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS
Cardinal Health, Inc. v. National Board of Medical Examiners
as 3:2020cv00453
Respondent:
National Board of Medical Examiners
Petitioner:
Cardinal Health, Inc.
Special Master:
Christopher Wilkes
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
