Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bizuru et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2024cv01399
Plaintiff:
Musafiri Jean Bizuru, Alexandre Maniragaba and Jean Pierre Ndaruhutse
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Department of State
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1154 Immigration: Procedure for Granting Immigration Status
Samuel v. U.S. Department of State
as 2:2019cv01786
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State
Plaintiff:
Robert T Samuel, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Joey Jurgensen v. Michael Pompeo
as 19-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEY JURGENSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, In her official capacity and MICHAEL R. POMPEO, Secretary, U.S. Department of State, In his official capacity
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv03636
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Michael R. Pompeo and Donald J. Trump
Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Abbetech Professional Resources, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser
as 1:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Abbetech Professional Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Curmen v. The Alexandria Health Department et al
as 1:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Luis David Curmen
Defendant:
The Alexandria Health Department, U.S Department of State Office of Medical Services, Kaiser Permanente and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M'Bayo v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
Sahr Etoam Bernard M'Bayo
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
M'Bayo v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2011cv01389
Plaintiff:
Sahr Etorm Bernard M'Bayo
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
