Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23968
Plaintiff:
Maureen Johnson and William D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv18911
Plaintiff:
Dorothy D. Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01724
Plaintiff:
Velma Johnson and Charles D Johnson
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv14305
Plaintiff:
Edith Johnson and Willy D. Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Pfizer Inc
as 0:2013cv03054
Plaintiff:
Virgie D Johnson
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27080
Plaintiff:
Linda D. Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv26306
Plaintiff:
Geri D. Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarence Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptist Church
as 13-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EBENEZER BAPTIST CHURCH, TRIANGE TRANSIT AUTHORITY, (TTA) Authority Bus System and BERNADETTE EVANS, Bus Supervisor
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09531
Plaintiff:
Geraldine D. Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Ebenezer Baptish Church et al
as 1:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
Ebenezer Baptish Church, Triange Transit Authority and Bernadette Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
