Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Lewis et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv01636
Plaintiff:
Ben Lewis and Damita Lewis
Defendant:
State of Maryland , HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., U.S. Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HONIG v. LADD et al
as 1:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
BARRY HONIG
Defendant:
ROBERT LADD, MGT CAPTIAL INVESTMENTS, INC., TERI BUHL and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jennings v. Johnson & Johnson Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv09339
Plaintiff:
Rachel Jennings
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Corp., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godfrey v. Johnson & Johnson Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
Angela Godfrey
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Corp. , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nantz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14354
Plaintiff:
Lisa Nantz
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfermann et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12450
Plaintiff:
Lisa Alfermann and Joseph Alfermann
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boutwell et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07898
Plaintiff:
Lisa K. Boutwell and Dwight W. Boutwell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Jane Doe Corporations 21-40 and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eudy et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06360
Plaintiff:
Ettie E. Eudy and Gary Eudy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lauer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04499
Plaintiff:
Judy B. Lauer
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deveraux v. Johnson & Johnson Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv02062
Plaintiff:
Wanda Deveraux
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Corp. , Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
