Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Knox et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv09374
Plaintiff:
Pamela Knox and Brad Knox
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childers v. Kyle
as 9:2016cv03286
Plaintiff:
Brad Childers
Defendant:
James Edward Kyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bake et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00715
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Brad Bake and Kay Bake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burgin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16533
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Burgin and Brad Burgin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 8:2015cv03836
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, Halliburton Company and others
Receiver:
Jimmy Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weasenforth v. Hyra et al
as 3:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Weasenforth
Defendant:
Mary Hyra, Jeremy Goodwin, Illyannah Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Allison et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30393
Plaintiff:
Cindy Allison and Brad Allison
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29129
Plaintiff:
Kristine Pearson and Brad Pearson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinnemeyer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28914
Plaintiff:
Jo Tinnemeyer and Brad Tinnemeyer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv27613
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Davis and Brad Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Caldera Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
