Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Romero v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2015cv03993
Plaintiff:
Santos Romero
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero v. KMG Hauling, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv03410
Plaintiff:
Danna Gloria Romero
Defendant:
KMG Hauling, Inc. and Ismael Feliciano Olivencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nadine Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04437
Plaintiff:
Nadine Smith , Carolyn Jones-Hedgepeth , Lita Haman and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Greenstone LLC , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13546
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Romero
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12424
Plaintiff:
Terrie F. Romero and Hilton J. Romero
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv10876
Plaintiff:
Mary Romero
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caballero v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10428
Plaintiff:
Celia Romero Caballero
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09425
Plaintiff:
Suzette Romero
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Guzman et al
as 5:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
Oscar G. Hernandez
Defendant:
Salvador Guzman, Juan Romero and Mario Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vasquez et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv05855
Plaintiff:
Isabel Vasquez , Dolly Cardenas , Sharon Morningstar and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
