Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Guy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15265
Plaintiff:
Pamela Guy and Lee A. Guy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerry A. Hurst v. Guy Harbert
as 15-2000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY A. HURST
Defendant - Appellee:
GUY HARBERT, in their individual and official capacities, MAXWELL WIEGARD, in their individual and official capacities, MARTY HARBIN, in their individual and official capacities and others
Leonard et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12199
Plaintiff:
Betty Leonard and Guy W. Leonard
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leonard et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12209
Plaintiff:
Betty Leonard and Guy W. Leonard
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08709
Plaintiff:
Jean Guy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Fennell et al
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Melvin Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Claude M. Fennell and Guy Shavender Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruitt v. Davis H. Elliot Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Amity Rose Guy Pruitt
Defendant:
Davis H. Elliot Company, Inc. and Appalachian Power Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: NC Swine Farm Nuisance Litigation
as 5:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs , Betty Collier , Andrew High and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC , Joyce Ann Hardison and Daisy J. Fennell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Troutman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ruth Troutman and Guy C. Troutman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29927
Plaintiff:
Connye T. Guy and Steven R. Guy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
