Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Coleman v. Davol et al
as 1:2016cv04080
Plaintiff: Brenda Lee Coleman
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01194
Plaintiff: THERESA P. REED
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deinlein et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03191
Plaintiff: Nancy M. Deinlein and Paul B. Deinlein
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. and Does 1 through 100 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beal v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00271
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tommy Lee Beal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beal v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00143
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tommy Lee Beal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shackleford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02278
Plaintiff: David Shackleford
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bible et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05163
Plaintiff: Mary L. Bible and Don Bible
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Day v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04893
Plaintiff: Barbara S. Day
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindenmuth et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03919
Plaintiff: Cheryl Lindenmuth and Henry Lindenmuth
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03836
Plaintiff: Denise Marshall and Steve Marshall
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?