Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Charles Lloyd Johnson et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd Johnson and Cathrynn Ann Ackerman Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sidney Michael Lee et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01749
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Michael Lee, Marshall Earl Harris, Demetrius Lenard Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv18908
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ann Johnson and Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01724
Plaintiff:
Velma Johnson and Charles D Johnson
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charles Francis Johnson and Robin Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas King and Mark Jamalian King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Johnson et al v. Frederick Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02312
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Johnson and Theresa Johson
Defendant:
Frederick Memorial Hospital, Inc., Ravi Yalamanchili, M.D., Ravi Yalamanchili, M.D., P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Branch-Williams v. Office of Human Resource Management et al
as 1:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
Joyce Branch-Williams
Defendant:
Office of Human Resource Management, Robert R. Davis, Beth Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Branch-Williams v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joyce Branch-Williams
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Beth Carr, Jeffrey M. Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
