Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Ramson Walker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04436
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ramson Walker and Michelle M Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Samuel Whatley v. Richland County Family Court, Columbia, SC
as 23-1449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHLAND COUNTY FAMILY COURT COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINA, PHOEBE WHATLEY, MONET S. PINCUS, Family Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Casey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04072
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Casey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rupp v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01114
Plaintiff:
Michelle M Rupp
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00627
Plaintiff:
Michele M. May
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guest v. Rivard et al
as 8:2016cv03680
Plaintiff:
Natarsha Guest
Defendant:
Michelle M. Rivard and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoffman et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03157
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Hoffman and Michelle M. Kram
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Audi of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bunyard et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12119
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Bunyard and James G. Bunyard
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowe et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02758
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Rowe and Mark Rowe
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
