Cases 111 - 120 of 11,467
SMITH v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2024cv00632
Defendant:
K. ANTAL, THOMAS DOUB, K. LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHEAL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Ratledge et al
as 5:2024cv00440
Defendant:
Julie Bell, Jennifer Bedford, Brian Ratledge and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Davis and Stetson Mansfield Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Burton v. EL Academies Inc
as 7:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Marie Burton
Defendant:
ELA Academies INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00438
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pompliano et al v. City of Roanoke Rapids et al
as 4:2024cv00107
Defendant:
Rose Beachem, City of Roanoke Rapids, Dennis Harvey and others
Plaintiff:
AJP Group, LLC d/b/a Pomp Boys Motors and Vivian Pompliano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
DRAKE v. LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
