Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP), et al. v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv02110
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Deborah K. Chasanow , Richard D. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) , Marinna L. Callaway , Jose Jehuda Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rowe v. Hazel
as 3:2013cv00558
Plaintiff:
John M. Rowe
Defendant:
William A. Hazel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Wallace v. Gains et al
as 1:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
Harry Lenzy Wallace
Defendant:
Hazel Gains, Jane Doe and Tammy H. Dinterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John Burnley v. Bryan Norwood
as 11-1729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN T. NORWOOD, Colonel (pty), Chief of Police for the City of Richmond, JOHN VENUTI, Chief of Police - Virginia Commonwealth University, HOWARD J. HICKS, Captain and others
Burnley v. Norwood et al
as 3:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers Burnley
Defendant:
Bryan T. Norwood, John Venuti, Howard J. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kenneth Liggins v. William A. Hazel, Inc.
as 08-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM A. HAZEL, INC., DARRELL WOLFE, TOMMY SHELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
