Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kim Strickland v. John Jabe
as 14-6229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM M. STRICKLAND, Personal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Aaron A. Cooper
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN JABE, Director, Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, TRACY RAY, Warden, Red Onion State Prison and others
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Strickland v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Defendant:
Tony Adams, (First Name Unknown) Ball, James Bentley and others
Plaintiff:
Kim M Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin Reaves v. Sherry Rhode
as 12-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, PhD
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY R. RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Clerk of Court for Marion County, MARK RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Marion County, LEVON NICHOLS, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Marion County and others
Defendant:
WILLIE DEAN WHITE, individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Newt Gingrich v. Charles Judd
as 12-1068
Plaintiff:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEWT GINGRICH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia and JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia and JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1042
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia
Rick Perry v. Charles Judd
as 12-1047
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK PERRY
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEWT GINGRICH, RICK SANTORUM and JON HUNTSMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUDD, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in her official capacity and DONALD PALMER, member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, in his official capacity
Defendant:
PAT MULLINS, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia
Perry v. Judd et al
as 3:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
Rick Perry
Defendant:
Charles Judd , Kimberly Bowers , Don Palmer and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Newt Gingrich , Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, Inc.
Movant:
Ronald Cook and Charles Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
