Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Emrit v. Cegavske et al
as 8:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Barbara Cegavske, Secretary of State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals
as 15-1944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeal
as 15-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Emrit et al v. U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) et al
as 1:2014cv01612
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Nicole Rocio Leal-Mendez
Defendant:
U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
