Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brantley v. WakeMed et al
as 5:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Brantley
Defendant:
WakeMed, Jason Jones, Keith Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Moore et al v. Nanz et al
as 5:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Linwood Dajuan Moore and Brandon Michael Leach
Defendant:
Officer David Michael Nanz and Town of Mount Olive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Talley v. Folwell et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Patsy Talley
Defendant:
Dale Folwell, State of NC, Dep't of State Treasurer Retirement Systems Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oliver v. White et al
as 5:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
Latwanya Oliver
Defendant:
Justin J. White, Western Surety Company and Vance County Sheriff Curtis R. Brame
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bolin v. Padron et al
as 5:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Tommy Brown, Gerald Padron, Ronald Boseman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charles Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
