Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Richard Capell v. C. Lee Carter, III
as 14-1168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CAPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
C. LEE CARTER, III, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, YORK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
TROOPER SCDPS and DEPUTY, York County
Capell v. Carter et al
as 3:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
Richard A Capell
Defendant:
Trooper Jenkins, Deputy Alderage, Trooper SCDPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ballentine, et al v. Town of Coats, et al
as 5:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Ballentine , David C. Strickland and Connie W. Strickland
Defendant:
The Town of Coats , Duncan Edward Jaggers , Kelly W. Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGill v. Town of Coats, et al
as 5:2012cv00631
Defendant:
The Town of Coats , Duncan Edward Jaggers , Kelly W. Fields and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E McGill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orlando Lee, Sr. v. FBI
as 09-1505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO C. LEE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Lee v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2008cv00437
Plaintiff:
Orlando C. Lee, Sr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rakesh Wahi v. John Does I-X
as 06-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAKESH WAHI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLESTON AREA MEDICAL CENTER, INCORPORATED, A West Virginia Corporation, GLENN CROTTY and JOHN DOES I-X
Defendant:
JANE DOE NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 10, JAMAL KAHN, H. RASHID and others
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
