Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Estate of Jaquyn O'Neill Light v. Marcus Pollock
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JAQUYN O'NEILL LIGHT, by and through James Hunt Johnson, Administrator
Defendant:
MARCUS POLLOCK, in his individual and official capacities, JEFF PRITCHARD, in his official capacities and CITY OF GRAHAM, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brett v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv04535
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Robert Rochinel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Young v. Washington Gas Light Company et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Young
Defendant:
Washington Gas Light Company and Temporary Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Washington Gas Light Company
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Dawn Savage Williams
Defendant:
Washington Gas Light Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Robert Johnson v. Maria Imperial
as 22-1733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA L. IMPERIAL, GEICO CORPORATION, STEVEN L. MAURER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
