Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Holbert et al v. Laurens County et al
as 6:2020cv01177
Defendant:
Laurens County and Dale Satterfield
Plaintiff:
Ron Smith, Zach Jamison and Cathy Holbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 16-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville
as 14-7180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Jacobs et al v. Iredell County et al
as 5:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Cindi Jacobs and Maureen Wilcox
Defendant:
Iredell County, Christine Royal, Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 14-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. J. Barefoot
as 14-6220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BAREFOOT, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. J. Barefoot
as 13-7797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BAREFOOT, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
