Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HENDERSON v. SHANLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LAMOND HENDERSON
Defendant:
ASHLIE SHANLEY, NATHANIEL KNUST, VAN WORTH SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cain v. Bladen County et al
as 7:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
William Colt Cain
Defendant:
N C Bladen County, James A. McVicker, Michael Hal Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Town of Mint Hill et al
as 3:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Willie "Will" Shaw
Defendant:
Town of Mint Hill, Errol J. Wedra, Jr., Marnee R. Moberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miall et al v. City of Asheville et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Miall, Robyn Hite, David Shaw and others
Defendant:
City of Asheville, Debra Campbell and Esther Manheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Henderson v. Cabarrus County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamond Henderson
Defendant:
Cabarrus County Sheriff's Office, Van Worth Shaw, James Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
