Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff: SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant: WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
Saadiq Long v. William Barr
as 24-1369
Plaintiff: SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant: WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capactiy only and others
Jacqueline Pelt v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 23-1279
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACQUELINE PELT, DON CARZELL PELT and SYRIA PELT
Defendant / Appellant: PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, JOHN DOE MARYLAND STATE POLICE TROOPERS 1-5, in their individual capacities and others
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
as 22-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENCY and others
Pelt et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00429
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Pelt, Don Carzell Pelt and Syria pelt
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Leon Haughton v. US
as 22-1056
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEON HAUGHTON
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENCY and others
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Costanzo Duke and Kirstjen Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-2240
Plaintiff - Appellant: INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, JOHN DOES #1 & 3 and others
Plaintiff: PAUL HARRISON, IBRAHIM AHMED MOHOMED, ALLAN HAKKY and others
Defendant - Appellee: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Eblal Zakzok v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-2233
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBLAL ZAKZOK, SUMAYA HAMADMAD, FAHED MUQBIL and others
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2231
Plaintiff - Appellee: INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, JOHN DOES #1 & 3 and others
Plaintiff: ALLAN HAKKY and SAMANEH TAKALOO
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?