Cases 91 - 100 of 134,412
Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravenscroft v. Office of the Fredrick County Comissions et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr
Defendant:
Office of the Fredrick County Comissions, Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth, Office of the Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias v. 176 Judicial District Court of Harris County et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Macias
Defendant:
176 Judicial District Court of Harris County and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnon v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
John L. McKinnon
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. USA
as 3:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CLOSNER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
TERRY JAMES CLOSNER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2024cv03054
Petitioner:
Thurl Rakim Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shelton v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00350
Petitioner:
Elwood Shelton
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopherson v. Clarke
as 3:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Mark Todd Christopherson
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rufus v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael Rufus
Defendant:
Vasquez, Thompson, McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
