Cases 101 - 110 of 124
Steele v. Bachelor et al
as 5:2007ct03052
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Bachelor, Harrison, James King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. POLK
as 1:2007cv00278
Petitioner:
ZANE A. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARVIN L. POLK and MARVIN L. POLK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Beeler et al
as 5:2007hc02064
Petitioner:
Kevin Sean Polk
Defendant:
A. F. Beeler and Alberto Gonazalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Royster v. Polk
as 07-6450
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMIAH ROYSTER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN L. POLK
Barefoot v. King et al
as 5:2007ct03038
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
James King, ., Marshall Hudson, Marvin L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2007ct03040
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Finesse G. Couch, Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Polk et al
as 5:2007ct03035
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Marvin Polk, R. Wellman, Linda D. Langdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thaggard v. Strickland et al
as 5:2007ct03033
Plaintiff:
James Thaggard
Defendant:
Lt. Strickland, Joseph Lightsey, R. Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefoot v. Polk et al
as 5:2007ct03029
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
Marvin Polk, DCC Board, Chaplain Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Glenn et al
as 5:2007ct03027
Plaintiff:
Zane Johnson
Defendant:
George T. Glenn, II, Marvin L. Polk, McFleur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
