Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Andrew Fields, III v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-6246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN STREEVAL, A. W. GOLDEY and others
Moss v. Trent et al
as 7:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Moss
Defendant:
Tim Trent, Joshua Salmon, Enochs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Reed et al
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Stephanie Reed, Mary Jane Dolan, Ryan Zuidema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Mullins et al
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gene Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Nick Mullins, Chad Barker, Boone County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Perry et al
as 7:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Edward's, Jr. and Ronald Gene Edwards
Defendant:
Lane Perry, Officer Barker and Andrew Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Chris Rich
as 22-7083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS RICH, STACEY CRABTREE, TODD E. ISHEE and others
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Chris Rich
as 22-7023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS RICH, STACEY CRABTREE, TODD E. ISHEE and others
US v. Eric Barker
as 22-6974
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC SCOTT BARKER, a/k/a Skateboard, a/k/a Skate
Brandon Barker v. US
as 22-6292
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON EARL BARKER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sprouse v. Grim et al
as 7:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Sprouse
Defendant:
Corporal Douglas W. Grimm, Lieutenant Brad Barker and Corporal Douglas W. Grim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
