Cases 21 - 30 of 75
VAN DYKE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
KENT BROWN, FRANK WITNEY, ROBERT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. CLERK OF COURT RUTHERFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00637
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
CLERK OF COURT RUTHERFORD COUNTY, PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION, TABOR CITY CI ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Van Dyke
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney, Robert James Davis, 12 Jury Members and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Van Dyke v. Kent Brown
as 15-6807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Prophet Saint
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT W. BROWN, Former Attorney of Mine; et al
Van Dyke v. Bell et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Patrick Bell, Wayne Abernathy, Kent Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Dennis Van Dyke
Defendant:
Kent W. Brown
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVIS, ROBERT JAMES DAVIS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC, STATE OF NC DOC, G. BILYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. WEBSTER et al
as 1:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
JOE WEBSTER, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, PATRICIA S. CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
