Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Percy Tucker v. Otisville Hufford
as 14-7841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY JAMES TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
OTISVILLE HUFFORD, Warden, HARRELL WATTS, DIRECTOR CHARLES E. SAMUELS and others
Daniel King v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-7528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL H. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and CHARLES RATLEDGE
Enrique Gomez v. Russell Perdue
as 14-7464
Petitioner - Appellant:
ENRIQUE GOMEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of FCI Gilmer
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, DIRECTOR OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Preacher v. Holder
as 5:2014hc02202
Petitioner:
Luke Ammon Preacher
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02982
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Danny Irick v. A. Mansukhani
as 14-7279
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY DEWAYNE IRICK, a/k/a Danny D. Irick
Respondent - Appellee:
A. MANSUKHANI, Warden
Respondent:
C. SAMUELS, Director and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-7254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeffrey Whitlow v. Brick Tripp
as 14-6998
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY WHITLOW
Respondent - Appellee:
BRICK TRIPP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02025
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randle Cooke v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-6903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDLE PORTER COOKE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.