Cases 21 - 30 of 1,628
Stokes v. Oreskey et al
as 5:2023ct03336
Plaintiff:
Nazai Frank Stokes
Defendant:
Matthew Oreskey and Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omari Mason v. McKelvin #81
as 23-7201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI KEISAUN MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
MCKELVIN #81, Sergeant and JONES, Correctional Officer
Defendant:
KEVIN TALLEY, Lieutenant, FRANK MACK, Major, LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent and others
Miles v. Hall et al
as 1:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
Frank Hall, Maryland Parole Commission and Richard L. Lonhom Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Delorenzo v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Frank Delorenzo
Respondent:
Mr. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rainey v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Frank V. Rainey
Defendant:
B. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Najarred Walker v. Frank Bishop
as 23-7138
Petitioner / Appellant:
NAJARRED T. WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Leonard Haley v. Holly Hoover
as 23-7119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD LEE HALEY
Defendant / Appellee:
HOLLY HOOVER, DR. ASRESAHAGN GETACHEW, Corizon Statewide Director, DR. HOWARD LEE COOK and others
Ofori v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Manis et al
as 7:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Anderson, B.J. Ravizee, J.W. Carico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
