Cases 21 - 30 of 5,080
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
US v. Maurice Geter
as 24-6405
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE DARNELL GETER, a/k/a Rease
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. K. Richardson
as 24-6397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
K. RICHARDSON, (Lieutenant) at Sussex Complex, J. M. BRANCH, (Unit Manager/Chief of Housing and Programming) at Sussex Complex, BETH CABELL, (Head Warden) at Sussex Complex and others
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
James Barnett, Jr. v. Mr. Mouring
as 24-6395
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR., a/k/a Lady Ja Barnett
Defendant:
MR. MOURING
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
James R Wood
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joshua K. Bowen
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
