Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,027
Rufus v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff: Michael Rufus
Defendant: Vasquez, Thompson, McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff: Michael Atkins
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff: Cory Montae Macon
Defendant: Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy v. Warden of MCTC et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner: Michael Nealy
Respondent: Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Locklear et al
as 5:2024ct03110
Plaintiff: Michael Edward Miller
Defendant: Superintendent Locklear, Nurse P. Pierre, OIC of Seg. Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marciano v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner: Michael Marciano
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drayton v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00795
Petitioner: Michael Drayton
Respondent: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Pickens v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6439
Petitioner: BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Respondent: TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Edwards v. Mathena et al
as 7:2024cv00296
Plaintiff: Michael Derrick Edwards
Defendant: Randall C. Mathena, Lois Fegan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deegan v. Hutcheson et al
as 7:2024cv00301
Plaintiff: Michael John Deegan
Defendant: Bryan F. Hutcheson, Michelle Woods, Alicia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?