Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Michael Tory, Jr. v. R. Methena We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-7779
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL TORY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: R. C. METHENA, Warden
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NEAL v. STERLING et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00904
Plaintiff: TORI NEAL
Defendant: ANNA STERLING, DURHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT/DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and IBRIHIM WAHEED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHING v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2013cv00239
Petitioner: TORY LEE RUSHING
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSHING v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00067
Petitioner: TORY LEE RUSHING
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tory v. United States District Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00905
Petitioner: Michael Tory, Jr.
Respondent: United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chisholm v. Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00528
Plaintiff: Tori D. Chisholm
Defendant: Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
German v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00543
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Tori German
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chisholm v. Watson
as 1:2008cv00775
Plaintiff: Tori Chisholm
Defendant: Bryan Watson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tory v. Lee, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2003cv00178
Respondent: Jack Lee
Petitioner: Michael Ellery Tory, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?