Cases 51 - 60 of 125
Wagner v. Beachy et al
as 1:2014cv00791
Plaintiff:
John Alexander Wagner
Defendant:
John S. Beachy, Brandon R. Self, Jamie C. Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 14-6134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LEE CONRAD
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, R. A. PERDUE, Warden and others
Defendant:
NUMEROUS FCI GILMER EMPLOYEES, Officers, Secretaries, Counselors, Case Managers, etc.
Hinton v. Conrad
as 5:2013ct03297
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Robert J. Conrad, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen Poston v. Robert Conrad, Jr.
as 13-7882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN WAYNE POSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., Judge, VENTO, Assistant US Attorney, ODULIO, Assistant US Attorney and others
Falice v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv00629
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Falice
Respondent:
United States of America, Graham C. Mullen, Robert J. Conrad, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poston v. Conrad et al
as 3:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Poston
Defendant:
Robert Conrad, Jr., FNU Vento, FNU Odulio and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall Conrad v. Warden Drew
as 13-7659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LEE CONRAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DREW and OFFICER SMITH, Kitchen Staff
Defendant:
FCI BENNETTSVILLE SC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-7384
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hinton v. United States et al
as 5:2013ct03207
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
United States, James C. Dever, III and Robert J. Conrad, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. Rounds et al
as 1:2013cv02480
Plaintiff:
Eddie Murphy
Defendant:
D. W. Rounds, Officer Whetstone, L. Conrad Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
