Cases 51 - 60 of 90
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01408
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laquan Simmons v. Cumberland County Municipality
as 16-7123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAQUAN LORENZO SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, KELLY DIAMOND, SARAH THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., C.C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeill v. Cumberland County Jail
as 5:2016ct03203
Plaintiff:
Shekia McNeill
Defendant:
Cumberland County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00979
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, CHRISTOPHER C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. PARSEK et al
as 1:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOHN PARSEK, MARION WILSON, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE N.C. ZONING DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
