Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Maye v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 5:2013hc02137
Petitioner:
Anthony Maye
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bullard v. Mail Room Staff at Warren Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2013ct03103
Plaintiff:
William Domonic Bullard
Defendant:
Mail Room Staff at Warren Correctional Institution, Ronald Mayes and Joyce Kornegay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Mayes et al
as 5:2013ct03076
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Gant
Defendant:
Ronald Mayes, State of North Carolina, Johnnie Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullard v. Granger et al
as 5:2013ct03042
Plaintiff:
William Domonic Bullard
Defendant:
Sergeant Granger, Ronald Mayes and Joyce Kornegay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. US Parole Commission
as 5:2013hc02043
Petitioner:
Anthony Maye
Respondent:
US Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gregory v. Kornegay et al
as 5:2013ct03010
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Gregory, III
Defendant:
Joyce Kornegay, Johnny Hawkins and Ronald Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Goodman v. Gene Johnson
as 12-7990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH D. GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, JOHN JABE and others
Defendant:
G. ROBINSON, ELTON BROWN, Doctor, KRYM and others
Johnston v. Daniels et al
as 5:2012ct03227
Plaintiff:
William Harold Johnston, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennis Daniels, J. Outlaw, John Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Kornegay et al
as 5:2012ct03161
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Pugh
Defendant:
Joyce Kornegay, Ronald Mayes and Mrs. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2012cv00762
Petitioner:
Norman Lindsey Mayes
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
