Cases 51 - 60 of 167
Weber v. USA
as 1:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Ashley Marie Weber
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Weber v. USA
as 1:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Dallas Edward Weber, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Fleming v. Weber et al
as 1:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Christopher B. Fleming, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Shane Weber, Corizon Health, Inc., Janette Clark, N.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvin Faulkner v. Ronald Weber
as 22-6224
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALVIN FAULKNER
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD S. WEBER
Aurel v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Mitch Aurel and Mich Aurel
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Larry Hogan, Wayne Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00355
Petitioner:
Danny C. Hoskins
Respondent:
Warden
Defendant:
Warden Weber, Corizon Correctional Health care and Dr. Stephan D. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowell v. Western Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Daniel Lowell
Defendant:
Western Correctional Institution, Warden Ronald Shane Weber, Sgt. Alicia Cartwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Poole v. Ronald Weber
as 22-6073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER, ASSISTANT WARDEN BRADLEY BUTLER, CHIEF OF SECURITY J. L. HARBAUGH and others
Floyd v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv03291
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Shane Weber, Chief of Security Keith Arnold, Lt. A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2021cv02934
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Warden Weber, Dr. Choudry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
