Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Saunders v. DeWitt
as 3:2009cv03290
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Leroy Saunders, III
Defendant:
H Wayne DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Haines v. DeWitt
as 8:2009cv03235
Plaintiff:
Stanley Dale Haines
Defendant:
H Wayne DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. DeWitt
as 6:2009cv03011
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bernard Jones
Defendant:
H Wayne DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Nelson v. DeWitt
as 0:2009cv03001
Plaintiff:
Domian LeMarko Nelson
Defendant:
H Wayne DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Christopher Olszowy v. Joseph Schmutz
as 09-8064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEONARD OLSZOWY and ANNA OLSZOWY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH STEPHEN SCHMUTZ, BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER OF THE SOLICITOR NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and others
Defendant - None:
WAYNE DEWITT, Sheriff, Berkeley County and RICHARD DRIGGERS, Major
DEWITT v. USA
as 4:2009cv70083
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Irby Gene DEWITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Goode v. USA
as 3:2009cv00479
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kelvin Dewitt Goode
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rutland v. Dewitt et al
as 8:2009cv01807
Plaintiff:
William Howard Rutland, III
Defendant:
Wayne Dewitt, Barry Currie, Butch Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rutland v. Dewitt et al
as 8:2009cv01754
Plaintiff:
William Howard Rutland, III
Defendant:
Wayne Dewitt, Barry Currie, Butch Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rutland v. Dewitt et al
as 8:2009cv01753
Plaintiff:
William Howard Rutland, III
Defendant:
Wayne Dewitt, Barry Currie, Butch Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
