Cases 61 - 70 of 738
Corey Jones v. McCoy
as 22-7361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY J. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
MCCOY, C/O at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, B. HURLEY, C/O at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, SHANNON KEEN and others
Owen v. Mackey et al
as 7:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Francis Owen
Defendant:
#72 Lt. Mackey, Hau #114 Custard, Sgt. Geronamis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Schmidit et al
as 7:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Francis Owen
Defendant:
Schmidt, Williams, Sgt. F. Garris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Owens et al
as 7:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Reaves
Defendant:
J. W. Owens, Conley and Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurley v. Owens et al
as 7:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Josephn F. Hurley
Defendant:
Billy Owens, Brook Owens, Ricard Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McCoy et al
as 7:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Jones
Defendant:
McCoy, B. Hurley, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Pugh et al
as 7:2022cv00621
Defendant:
Lieutenant Dye, Chad Pugh, Unit Manager Dye and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Derik Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00626
Defendant:
Lieutenant D. Dye, Unit Manager Dye, Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Young
as 5:2022ct03385
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Owen Daniels
Defendant:
Rhonda Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
