Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ethan Morrison
Defendant:
Corporal Waylen Miller and Corporal N. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sabino v. Bayliss
as 5:2023cv00229
Petitioner:
Zaldy N. Sabino
Respondent:
Melissa Bayliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Light v. Milini et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Colton Light
Defendant:
C. O. Milini, Angelo J. Viani, Katherine N. Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Alderson Federal Prison Camp
as 1:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Jennifer N. Manley
Respondent:
Alderson Federal Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Payne v. Thacker et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christopher N. Payne
Defendant:
Medical Doctor Thacker, Wexford Medical Service's Department of Rehabilitation's D.C.R. "ERJ" and "PHRJ" and E. Tomlison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bock v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
Adam N. Bock
Respondent:
Melissa J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kessler v. Lewis et al
as 5:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Kessler, III
Defendant:
Cornelius Russell Lewis, Gold Quality Foods, Cpl. N. J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00227
Petitioner:
Ruffin L. Parker
Respondent:
N. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jiles v. McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Jeana N. Jiles
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
