Cases 1 - 10 of 3,689
Brown v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv04987
Defendant:
Prosecutor Clemons, Michael Robinson, Judge Michael Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Kendris Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
DiBiase v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00126
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Petitioner:
Paul DiBiase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02122
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2024cv05077
Petitioner:
Jonathan Michael Brown
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Imel et al
as 3:2024cv04954
Plaintiff:
Nakedric Johnson
Defendant:
Deputy Rebekah Brown and Deputy Deva Imel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Black v. Angello et al
as 5:2024cv04949
Defendant:
Caleb Reeves, Christopher Fudge, Charles Angello and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brown v. Wagner et al
as 8:2024cv04076
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, P Wagner and Anderson County
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dwayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Williams v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Lachaunti Williams
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00181
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Petitioner:
Charles Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. City of Belton et al
as 8:2024cv04781
Defendant:
Anderson County and City of Belton
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dwayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
