Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johnson v. Stine et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ternae Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Ofc. Christopher Stine, Ofc. Aaron Hankins, Ofc. M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozier v. Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee et al
as 7:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rozier
Defendant:
Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee and Captain USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rozier v. Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee et al
as 7:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rozier
Defendant:
Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee and Captain USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Case II v. Danville City Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2019cv00745
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Seepe, Capt. Martin, Mr. FNU Bugsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
as 7:2019cv00746
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
as 7:2019cv00719
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
as 3:2019cv00787
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth City of Danville, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Danville City Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Seepe, Capt. Martin, Mr. FNU Bugsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case II v. Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
as 3:2019cv00788
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Case II
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia City of Danville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Swann et al
as 3:2019cv00564
Plaintiff:
Darnell Alonzo Keyes and Darnell Alonzo Keys
Defendant:
R.N. Walton, Ms. Cunningham, A.W. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
