Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. OPEN DOOR MINISTIRIES
as 1:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
OPEN DOOR MINISTIRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Gould et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony Gould, J. Moore, LT Littrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. King
as 5:2022hc02164
Petitioner:
Tawoine Banks
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Petitioner:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Respondent:
DANNY ROGERS, D.W. COOKE, W.M. EVANS and others
Defendant:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, SERGEANT D. W. COOKE, OFFICER W. M. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LANCE
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
DR. EDWARD LANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LANCE et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
DR. EDWARD LANCE, RN GREEN, M. Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LANCE, ET AL
as 1:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
DR. EDWARD LANCE and SGT. H. ARMENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
